The guide helps explain the product and does not replace professional advice.

Article

How the book and project were assembled

On this page

The book combines polls and participant stories. Anecdotes and descriptive polls do not establish causation or clinical efficacy.

  • Questions were added as the project developed.
  • Polls and stories provide different kinds of information.
  • Editorial emphasis does not strengthen the evidence.

Where the data came from

Public polling and report collection on Telegram began in August 2019. The questionnaire reached 107 questions, added over time, so response counts differed between questions.

  • Not everyone answered every question.
  • This is not one group with complete responses.

What the method can show

The author explicitly states that the project was not a double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial. Its numbers describe participant responses, with limited scope for generalization.

  • A reported change does not explain its cause.
  • Testing hypotheses requires other research methods.

How the stories were edited

Reports were translated from Russian, punctuation was edited for clarity, and words describing positive effects were highlighted. These are presentation choices, not independent verification of the stories.

  • Translation and editing shape the account.
  • Highlighted words do not replace reading the full report.

Reading critically

Distinguish an answer to a question, an individual story, and an author interpretation. Check the page, data type, and limitations behind a statement before turning an observation into an expected result.

  • A poll describes how respondents chose answers.
  • A story can suggest a question, not confirm a treatment.
Poll

Responses to a particular question.

Story

Individual experience as described by a participant.

Conclusion

An interpretation to assess against the method.

Sources

Back to topics